Stop treating Ronaldo like slave, Blatter tells United


Written by: AFP Bookmark and Share
2008-07-10 11:45:19

FIFA president Sepp Blatter has urged Manchester United to stop treating Cristiano Ronaldo (pictured here in June 2008) like a ´modern-day slave´ and let the Portuguese player join Real Madrid if he wants to.
  FIFA president Sepp Blatter has urged Manchester United to stop treating Cristiano Ronaldo (pictured here in June 2008) like a ´modern-day slave´ and let the Portuguese player join Real Madrid if he wants to.
LONDON (AFP) - FIFA president Sepp Blatter has urged Manchester United to stop treating Cristiano Ronaldo like a 'modern-day slave' and let the Portuguese player join Real Madrid if he wants to.

Ronaldo, a boyhood Real fan, has been linked with a move to the Spanish capital since the end of last season even though he scored a hugely impressive 42 goals in all competitions last term as United won both the Premier League and Champions League trophies.

Wading into the protracted wrangle over the 23-year-old's future, Blatter said that the current practice of tying players to long contracts amounts to "modern slavery".

And he urged Manchester United and Real Madrid "to sit together" if Ronaldo wants a move to the Spanish club.

"The important thing is, we should also protect the player," Blatter told Sky News on Thursday.

"If the player wants to play somewhere else, then a solution should be found because if he stays in a club where he does not feel comfortable to play then it's not good for the player and for the club.

"I'm always in favour of protecting the player and if the player, he wants to leave, let him leave."

Blatter believes the issue raises questions about the way transfers and contracts are dealt with in the game.

"I think in football there's too much modern slavery in transferring players or buying players here and there, and putting them somewhere," he continued.

"We are trying now to intervene in such cases. The reaction to the Bosman law is to make long-lasting contacts in order to keep the players and then if he wants to leave, then there is only one solution, he has to pay his contract."

United issued a swift rebuke to Blatter's outburst, insisting that all their players were happy to sign contracts with the club and knew the consequences of entering into such an agreement.

A United spokesperson said: "All our players - like at other clubs - enter into their contracts after an open and free negotiation.

"Most of whom do after taking advice from a FIFA-registered agent.

"Many do so on a number of occasions and enjoy long and successful stays at Old Trafford."

UEFA's communications director William Gaillard, who serves as special advisor to European football governing body president Michel Platini, was also unimpressed by Blatter's outburst.

"It would be useful to remind people that slaves in all of the slavery systems never earned a wage," said Gaillard.

In contrast, Gaillard fears the Bosman ruling, which allows for free transfers at the end of contracts, has given players the upper hand and contributed to spiralling wages.

"It seems that both clubs and players are trying to negotiate an exit before the player is free," Gaillard said.

"It is a consequence of the Bosman ruling - there is nothing we can do about that.

"It is obvious that today players have a lot more power than they did 20 years ago, undoubtedly, and agents have a lot more power than they did 20 years ago.

"It is true that salaries are spiralling out of control. Many clubs have pointed that out."

Meanwhile, Blatter went on to dismiss the Premier League's much-criticised '39th step' proposals, insisting plans to play competitive matches overseas - either in the league or domestic cups - was doomed to fail.

He said: "The 39th game as presented will never happen. To my knowledge what they (the Premier League) want to do is perhaps to play some of the League Cup matches somewhere outside of England. That's the last information I got.

"They should just forget about that."




Discuss

newtonheath1878 July 10th, 2008 14:03

Lets get the debate going soccerettes, below are the views of an impartial fan, this bloke supports Leicester City fan, I wanted to show you this so the debate starts from a non ManUnited point of view. I must say i do agree with the comments. Whats your view people of the world?? I am not a Man Utd fan - I support Leicester but obvioulsy cannot miss whats happening in the news regarding Ronalso. I think Sepp Blatter should be sacked for his comments regarding this situation. The head of FIFA should not be making comments that are biased to any club and should always be neutral in decisions!! To say keeping Ronaldo at Man Utd is nothing better than slavery is disgusting! The manager and G8 clubs should call for him to be sacked!! How can a footballer who has willingly signed a contract, been nurtured into a worls class player by Ferguson and earns over £100,000 a week doing the best job in the world be compared to a slave? It's disgraceful and gives another insight into why football is becoming more and more corrupt!! What does he want? Players to not have contracts and play for different teams each week? I hope Ronaldo stays as not only is he good for English football but it proves that Blatter and Real Madrid (Who in my opinion are not as big as Man Utd now anyway) can't always get there own way! Ronaldo should honour the contract he willingly signed and everyone else should sit down shut up and accept he is not for sale.

The comments Blatter has made are completely unprofessional especially from the head of world football and why can he openly discuss and be biased on individual clubs and players? Its a joke!

Blatter and Platini always sl*g off English football, whats it got to do with them? If it wasn't for us they wouldn't have a job - we invented the sport!! Blatters comments are the final nail in the coffin for me and the leaders of G8/Uefa/The FA should all be calling for him to be sacked! Not only are his comments disgraceful but they are offensive to slavery in general! SACK HIM!!

BesTalentScout July 10th, 2008 14:51

Ronaldo is lucky i'm not living in England or i'll end all this nonsense and the bastard's career by breaking his legs and balls.........the brat..........

Tontodonati July 10th, 2008 18:19

I'm staying out of this controversy. Anyone has the freedom to express his/her opinion. I'm sure that if Ronaldo doen't like staying at Manchester he will find a way out!

Guuner66 July 10th, 2008 19:47

frankly im an arsenal fan so if he leaves its better for my team lol. but i do believe he should honor his contract. so i agree with best talent scout. he is behaving like a little brat.

chakal July 10th, 2008 23:41

i like both teams and he is my favorite player alod with Tevez, so whatever he does is great for me, but what i don't apreciate is the manner/way of trying to get what he wants. Breach of contract, that all i have to say about him. suit him!!
Bestalentscout, stop trying to hurt people, join the UFC, they'll teach you!

Crusader1987 July 11st, 2008 01:37

There was once a time when a contract, negotiated and signed in good faith, were held as sacred in sports. Now, contracts seem to not even be worth the paper they are written on. I completely agree with NewtonHeath1878, though I would not go as far as calling for Blatter's resignation for this, as Man U would be greatly compensated by Real Madrid if they gave in to Ronaldo's wishes. And if Man U and Real Madrid agreed to transfer Ronaldo's contract to Madrid, I'd have no problem with that. But Ronaldo has to honor the contract he signed with Manchester United, plain and simple. Once the contract's time has expired, he can sign a new one with Real Madrid or whatever other club he wants to (Man U would probably sell him to another team before that happened so that they'd get something when he left instead of getting nothing when he becomes a free agent). I agree it was out of line for Blatter to say what he said, but I don't think it's biased. Obviously, at some amount of money, Man U would benefit from losing Ronaldo.

ajax72 July 11st, 2008 04:02

What's wrong with playing each year for a different club?Every one knows that 3,4, 5 year contracts are unrealistic but both clubs and players keep on signing them. In football the natural length of the contract is one season. At its end, if both parties are content, they can prolong it. If not just kiss goodby. I know this won't help long term planning but the actual situation isn't different in practice.

Giorgio July 11st, 2008 12:21

Why is everyone getting so hot and bothered about Ronaldo wanting to move to another club ? Some people have the strange notion that a soccer player is somehow bound for life to a soccer team/club. What a lot of nonsense !!!!
A soccer player is a professional and he is free to work wherever he wishes. And he is also a human being and he desrves to live his life without being insulted by people he doesn't even know !!!!!!!!!!!

Crusader1987 July 11st, 2008 13:45

I never insulted Ronaldo (indeed, I believe he is the best soccer player in the world), nor do I say he has no right to move to Real Madrid. My issue is that it seems like he wants to break the contract he signed with Man U to play for Real Madrid. Unless Man U comes to some kind of mutual agreement with Ronaldo and/or Real Madrid on that front, it shouldn't happen.

This situation reminds me of Major League Baseball here in America (where players would actually sacrifice salary for a long-term deal). The club salaries are extremely disparate, as the New York Yankees spend over $200 million while the Florida Marlins spend in the vicinity of $20 million. However, there is a way that small clubs can compete with the big spending clubs, and that is by drafting good players and then being able to retain their services for seven years through a Reserve Clause (this clause used to be applied to all players, but now it's just to young players). That's how the Tampa Bay Rays can have the best record in baseball right now. However, once those seven years are up, those good players will end up in New York or Boston or some other big baseball market. Not unlike soccer really. If Ronaldo wants to play for Real Madrid, he will play for them eventually.

And obviously Ronaldo and Man U felt that a long-term deal was right at the time he was signed by the English club. For now, Ronaldo has to sleep in the bed he has made and make Real Madrid fill Man U's coffers to the tune of 100 million euros.

Tontodonati July 11st, 2008 19:08

Crusader 1987, how can the Yankees spend $200 Million to buy player but the Florida Marlins can only afford $20 Millions? In a different article you said that here in America we have a team salary cap! Can you elaborate on that without being prolix?

Crusader1987 July 12nd, 2008 00:54

Simple: Major League Baseball doesn't have a salary cap, and probably never will. The players' union is way too strong. It took forever to pass a drug testing program, for crying out loud. Instead, the MLB uses a forgiving luxury tax system, where teams who spend over a certain amount have to pay a tax to the league. A lot of leagues in America (including the MLS to some extent) have salary caps, but the MLB doesn't. That's why the Yankees can spend so much on players.